Last Update: 27 January, 2023
Please see our related page on COVID-19 Clearfacts
Here are clear and important facts on conventional medicine to understand and share to protect life:
Medicine is a for-profit business and it's incentive is to run like a for-profit business. It is naive to forget that, howevermuch it pays marketing companies to promote it as caring only about patient health.
People who are cured and healthy tend not to come back for any more medical services except an occasional checkup. Keeping people healthy is the least profitable way to practice medicine.
Prescribing prescriptions drugs to manage their problem, however, especially drugs which they are never intended to stop taking, ensures that person's life-long dependency on the physician for repeat visits to renew the prescription, and repeat orders of that drug. And they will pay virtually any price for them, now that their health depends on it.
In the medical industry, each disease is not merely a condition, but a business market to sell products and services for: for example the cancer market, COVID market, etc.
Natural remedies tend to be heavily attacked by the medical industry to not reach public notice or access. Isn't it strange that nothing natural has been announced by the medical industry to treat cancer or COVID, for example? Sometimes a physician will refuse to allow an institutionalized patient something, such as garlic, as a pill, by authoritarianism, which the patient would have been allowed to eat in their food. Vitamin D and ivermectin were attacked in the COVID pandemic despite their effectiveness, immediate availabilty, and relative safety. Any remedies which cannot be patented by pharmaceutical companies and especially those which patients can self-medicate without needing to repeatedly obtain a physician's preseription threaten the flow of revenue to the medical industry. Treatments which restore the patient to full intact health do not create the profitable dependency which drugs or especially surgery tend to do (there is a saying that once you go under the knife yo're never the same).
There's often little or no sense of medical professional alarm or regret or apology when treatments which the patient might hoped to cure do not. There's always another treatment to sell when it doesn't. For example, there was no medical industry alarm when the COVID-19 vaccines didn't confer immunity or end the pandemic as originally promised in their rollout; instead there were more boosters sold, which actually turns out being far more money for vaccine manufacturers than if the first dose worked.
Sometimes not only treatment but even the death of the patient are financially incentivised, as it was in the COVID-19 pandemic; an example video from Dec 13, 2022 is: Attorney Thomas Renz: We Have Incentivized The MURDER Of Patients- NOT The Treatment
Government has so much power that they shouldn't be allowed to have a killing incentive like that. Insurance companies also pay medical costs, but can't make orders or laws to lead people to their deaths.
January 10, 2023: The end game of government health care is government-assisted SUICIDE
Physicians receive orders and other unilateral declarations from the hospital they work for, the body which licenses them, the Government, and whoever actually funds the medical procedures. Whether or not the Public can get access to these communications, they are intented for the physician's eyes primarily. These orders can greatly influence patient advice, options, and treatment and medical reporting for that patient. We do not currently have copies of any (because we haven't searched on the internet), but from our ears anecdotal examples of what we have heard from such communications have included:
We notice some physicians unreasonably resisting patient requests for nonstandard medical tests or referrals to specialists; we suspect they have received some communication warning and restricting them to absolutely minimize tests and referrals to minimize costs for the medical insurance organization.
We notice numerous physicians having their licenses suspended for criticizing COVID-19 vaccines; we suspect that physicians were warned en masse in private communication not to critize these vaccines.
It's amazing how accepted adverse effects of pharmaceuticals are by the industry. Even telivision commercials for drugs explicitly mention horrible potential adverse effects which should make any moral physician refuse to prescribe them. But they still prescribe them. For example:
FACT: Pharmaceutical Companies not worthy of blind Public trust:
Quite the opposite. Many of the vaccine manufacturers have been exposed for serious immorality in numerous scandals in the past, neither is the history of the industry a good one. Here are some references:
FACT: Just because something is approved by Government for public distribution doesn't mean it is safe.
Of course not because many 'approved' pharmaceuticals have been killing people.
That's what 'Emergency Authorization' is for: distributing something unsafe while avoiding liability for harms.
There are many incentives at work besides public health in approving a product (if that is a concern at all), such as what Government wants and the powerful pharmaceutical lobby wants. Here are resources on the subject:
Also you might have noticed their tendency to approve synthetic drugs for treatment of disease but not natural herbs or vitamins.
To think that what is approved is what is healthy because these regulators only consider Public health and nothing else, is totally naive. Some examples of tragedies of the past:
FACT: Adverse effects of pharmaceuticals and other medical procedures are profitable for the medical industry..
Right or wrong, adverse effects tend to generate demand for more medical products and services.
It's not uncommon for the maker of a pharmaceutical which causes an adverse effect to make another product to sell you to help to combat that adverse effect. For example, whereas COVID-19 vaccines, such as by Moderna, are known to cause myocarditis sometimes, Moderna has released another product to supposedly heal heart muscle. Related articles:
This is a highly profitable business model where defects of the first product are not only accepted (and without legal liability) but generate demand for the second product. This is much more profitable than making products without adverse effects.
FACT: The ancient word from which 'pharmacy' and 'pharmaceutical' is derived is pharmakeia which the Bible translates as 'witchcraft' or 'sorecery' and warns against it.
FACT: The medical industry has tremendous influence over its own regulation.
This implies an ability to give them leeway against the Public good.
Here are resources on the subject:
FACT: Government regulators typically allow pharmaceutical companies to perform ALL of the required pre-clinical and clinical tests on their own products (which are then used by Government to decide approval of their products for Public distribution).
Typically, the Government regulator only evaluates the design and results presented by the manufacturer in deciding to approve or not.
The Government may claim to strictly oversee the trials, but they have no cost incentive to make the effort; only when they're actually performing the trials themselves would their oversight truly be ensured. Example article: November 28, 2022 Report: FDA’s failure to adequately oversee vaccine clinical trials is endangering public health
The incentive and opportunity for pharmaceutical companies to pervert the results in favour of their product are tremendous, as well as other moral problems. There is evidence this has happened in reality many times; as just a few examples:
If the Public health was of paramount importance, only the Government would be allowed to run at least the later safety trials.
Documentary: Science for Hire - A Gary Null Production
FACT: There is no requirement for physicians to use the most natural or harmless treatments first.
For example, complete removal of tonsils and gallbladders and apendices are often the first option conventional medicine uses to deal with problems concerning them.
All of the least harmful options should have been explored first if patient wellbeing was the primary goal. It's not.
Cutting out bodyparts alters the body in ways it can never be whole, and may become more and more dependent on the medical industry for products and services to support what is missing.
FACT: This industry doesn't hesitate to promote causing human death as healthcare.
The main two examples are abortion and euthanasia. Yes even a human fetus is still human and abortion kills that human. As for euthanasia, it can be demanded or it can be coerced and the Law makes no distinction. Example article: ‘Angels of death’: Whistleblower exposes horrors of British Columbia’s healthcare system
FACT: There are cases where family has to take the hospital to court to stop them from killing the patient.
FACT: The medical industry disempowers clients in ways most other industries do not.
FACT: Although patients are presumed to have inferior understanding compared to medical professionals, the medical industry tends to make it difficult to hold physicans responsible when their advice is followed but the patient gets worse.
Aspects to this:
FACT: Up to the early 1900s, Western medical practice was heavily based on natural methods.
Example article: How Rockefeller Created the Business of Western Medicine
FACT: Physicians have knowledge. But so does everyone else. It's a human quality.
The idea that someone becomes an infallible source of knowledge because they have a medical degree or license, and that this somehow invalidates everyone else's knowledge on that subject, is a worship culture which works against the haring of ideas. The unwritten law of this culture is that only a physician knows anything about medicine, always being right on medicine, since they are official experts, over anyone else who is not, to the point that anyone who is not a physician is condemned from commenting on health at all. It's like not being allowed to say it's warm outside without being a meteorologist. It's as though knowledge must be licensed by the Government to be spoken. It tramples the human capacity for anyone to learn and have knowledge and be correct about something. Examples of this attitude are:
FACT: As much as physicians know about medicine, there is so much that they don't know about medicine that you can easily die without them even knowing why.
For example, in Alberta for 2021, the Government there declared the leading cause of death was unknown causes. CArticle July 6, 2022: Deaths with unknown causes now Alberta's top killer: province
Worse, cause of death is a kind of educated guess, anyway, which is probably why verbal autopsies are performed routinely without any need to even see the deceased. So if they're allowed to guess and they still don't have enough confidence to put something down besides 'unknown', they must really be lost.
It's OK not to know everything and be doing your best. It's OK that humans are limited. What's not OK is when we are ordered to follow physician advice as though infallible.
FACT: Conventional medicine's knowledge and products are heavily based on cruel animal experiments.
These experiments are kept out of public view, and public mind as much as possible, but they are often hellish for the animals involved, and show a callous disdain for the other creatures we share our planet with.
This kind of research is touted as saving lives, but that's not true when animal life is included, and dubious when human life is included. It's just been too easy to get the Public to condone of torturing animals if they think there's a benefit, even if there isn't really. Example article: The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation
There is not even any requirement that the knowledge being pursued is actually worthwhile before sacrificing animals for it. That's how callous this abuse is.
If the animal trial fails against incentive, scientists can say that it's because animals are different from humans. If the animal trial succeeds for incentive, scientists can say that it supports an expectation of the result in humans.
No matter the intelligent-sounding arguments for supposed benefits from animal experimentation, the spiritual law (which dominates the physical world) of sowing and reaping simply will not allow products and treatments derived from cruelty to come to good. These products are cursed because of the cruelty used to develop/approve/manufacture them.
FACT: There is no practical incentive for physicians to report vaccine harms.
This is because:
Maybe that's why so many sudden deaths are being blamed on Anything But Vaccines (ABV): Beware: ABV disease (Anything But Vaccines) is causing people to DROP DEAD everywhere
A medical system which treats harms as related to the vaccine until proven otherwise (instead of mere coincidences until proven otherwise), autopsies which can detect vaccine harm, and incentives for medical professionals for reporting suspected harms would have all been better to protect the Public's health than a system which has many practical discouragements to report vaccine harms.
FACT: Vaccine worship (eg. trust, loyalty) is an unwritten requirement for a profession in conventional medicine.
There are enough examples of physicians being disciplined for vaccine criticism to draw the conclusions that vaccines are not permitted to be criticized, as though they are a god.
Overall example article October 03, 2022: STUDY: Doctors skeptical of vaccine safety face suppression, discrimination across medical field
Specifically in the COVID-19 crisis, many physicians were disciplined for opposing the official pro-COVID-vaccine narrative, for which example news articles are:
FACT: Only another physician may challenge the practice of a physician.
They're immune to criticism from outside the profession, even if people are dying from their treatments.
The incentive is to stick together to be immune to outside attack.
FACT: Conventional medicine does harm deliberately.
Conventional medicine is based on Machiavellian philosophy. It is willing to harm and kill, even healthy people, and destroy healthy tissue, so long as most people are expected to benefit. Machiavellian philosophy is how they can justify promoting pharmaceuticals and surgery to the Public which they know a minority of people will not survive: whether due to side effects, inherent risks of anaesthesia, or something else. The attitude is that if something is a 'rare' adverse effect, even if it's death, it is acceptable, and that they only need to shift those risks onto the Public in the consent process, rather than seriously considering not harming anyone. This is why, for example, the COVID-19 vaccination program was not stopped no matter the harms reported following it. Some examples:
Furthermore the Machiavellian philosophy is used in the extensive animal research used in development of drugs and treatments: these animals endure certain suffering and death in confined conditions, which is justified on the excuse that humanity will reap a greater benefit, whether we actually do or not.
This is not 'do no harm' medicine.
FACT: Conventional medicine is more governed by politics than science.
Diagnoses generally don't need to be proven, but only be defensible in the current medical culture and political climate. In court, only a physician may challenge another physician; a physician's legal safety is usually found in staying in agreement with the medical herd. For example, in the COVID-19 crisis, any criticism of the pro-vaccine narrative by medical professionals was usually disciplined, no matter how factual, but diagnosing patients as COVID-19 positive, even without any test, was accepted, to the point that cold & flu diagnoses (whose symptoms are similar) almost disappeared in 2020.
In such an approach, not only are politically promoted conditions likely to be overdiagnosed, but rare conditions or those with no direct test, especially if politicially incorrect, are at tremendous danger of being misdiagnosed as something more common or accepted. For example, vaccine harms are very difficult to prove with a test, especially when the technology of the vaccine exceeds the technology of testing, and especially when blaming vaccines goes strongly against the current medical industry culture: the risk of misdiagnosis of a vaccine harm is very high due to politics.
FACT: Misdiagnosis is a real problem and it can kill.
This idea that the physician always knows best and is always competent is naive. Anyone can make mistakes, and a high education doesn't negate that.
There are many obstacles for patients to detect and evidence misdiagnosis, including: diagnoses are usually given only verbally to patients, charts and test results are not usually accessible to the patient, and it takes another physician to detect it and be willing to challenge the first one for no benefit in return and possible professional reprisals.
The reality of the possibility of misdiagnosis is one reason why patients and families need to have the right to question what they are told and freedom to obtain a second opinion without reprisals, and even to refuse treatment, not as merely wrong choices they have the freedom to make, but as a potentially right choices for their health. For example,
Article December 20, 2022: Federal report: 250,000 Americans DIE every year after being MISDIAGNOSED in emergency rooms
FACT: There are branches of conventional medicine where physicians are permitted to make paient health much worse yet portray that as an improvement:
As for virus tests, they are not actually calibrated to a virus and should not matter: no matter what their results are.
Virology being a charlatan profession would explain why the health recommendations and assurances of virologists have kept dramatically changing towards even the same disease: for example, whether they choose to recommend masks this month or not. Perhaps if you ask a liar the same question at different times they give you different lies.
Why bother to lie and scare the public about the existence of contageous viruses? Virology is nothing more than an intelligent-sounding method for trusted authorities to stoke fear in the hearts of the Public as a tool to sell products, services, and/or human rights forfeitures, to which it is always closely related. For example, in the COVID-19 crisis, virologists, with mainstream media support, were able to so create so much fear in the Public that we not only accepted a gene therapy injection, but demanded it, with public money at literally any price, and demanded the suspension of human rights for everyone, particularly in mandating anyone who didn't already accept the vaccine to accept it.
Virologists have a tendency to give treatments following which the problem only gets worse, but this is usually overlooked due to trust in physicians and panic of the disease. For example, the AIDS drug AZT has been reported to actually cause immunosufficiency, and after the COVID-19 vaccines were accepted by the majority, the result was not the promised end to that pandemic, but COVID-19 variants and waves only exploded there:
Psychiatry: this is another harmful charlatan profession. Example video: Psychiatry: An Industry of Death By CCHR (2006)
Obstetrics: this profession actually KILLS pre-born children in many regions if he mother requests it. Someone might say that the pre-born child, or human fetus, is not the 'patient'. Actually the child should be, not only by being human but because in obstetrics there are normally two patients considered: mother and child. It's only if the mother wants an abortion that the child suddenly is considered a non-patient, and this is morally wrong.
Oncology: This is another medical profession which typically harms as it pretends to heal. Its tools are destructive, including: chemotherapy, destructive radiation, and destructive surgery. There seems no limit to what bodyparts these physicians are willing to destroy in the fear of cancer, nothing being sacred, removing not only cancerous tissue but often other tissue (such as lymph nodes), even if perfectly healthy, as a 'precaution'.
Maybe they understand how harmful it is: Most physicians refuse chemotherapy for themselves
This doesn't mean patients aren't grateful, because they are told the cancer will kill them and the oncologist is simply doing 'all they can' to save the person's life. The vulnerability, however, is that the entire story is generally from the oncologist's mouth to frame however they want.
Oncology may be unique in medical professions in that, unlike the others, which downplay the ability of the body to heal itself, oncology doesn't seem to recognize any chance that the body can heal itself (of cancer) at all, nevermind try to support that process. The premise is that if you have cancer you need one of these destructive treatments to stop it or you will certainly die and the longer you wait the chance of beating the cancer vanishes progressively. Facing an apparent certainty of death and extreme urgency to avoid it, and provided with no other option, most patients will allow the surgeon even to cut out half of their brain, or any appendage or organ, with tremendously life-changing effects which will often make them heavily dependent on medical care and devices for the rest of their lives.
Often more bodyparts are removed than the main target as a 'precaution'. Some people literally only find this out when they wake up after surgery.
It is disburbing to consider what kind of a person would perform such destruction of a living human body, and if they are just too limited in their knowledge or if they actually enjoy butchering people alive, and leaving the patient to somehow live with whatever bodyparts they are allowed to keep. It stands to reason that a compassionate person would not accept leaving someone with such a low quality of life but insist on approaches which do no harm.
If facing a decision of cancer surgery, it's critical to get a second opinion from an entirely independent physician, or at the very least see a copy of the indicative lab results yourself. A case was related to this author of a woman who was told to get a hysterectomy due to cancer, and she did, and suffered irreversibly, and lost her husband, only to find out later, when the chart fell into the hands of another physician, that the surgery was marked as elective and no mention of any cancer.
FACT: Pharmaceutical medications often use controversial development or ingredients which are not obvious to the consumer.
These can have serious moral or medical implications for the patient and should be made clear. For example:
FACT: Trust in the advice of medical experts lead us to accept dictatorship and fundamental human rights suspensions which we otherwise would not.
This was/is the basic idea of the COVID-19 crisis. Medical recommendation is now a well-proven excuse to get humanity to accept literally anything rather than allow the religious trust in conventional medicine to endure criticism.
FACT: Trust in Conventional Medicine is Literally Destroying Humanity Biologically and Politically
Over recent centuries, society has developed a blind trust in democratic Government and conventional medicine, as though anyone who was suspicious of either one was considered paranoid.
Unfortunately, even if you really are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
The fact is that medicine is for profit and Government is for control and both have tremendous incentive, from their design, to exploit the Public. They might not, if their internal morality overrides the temptations of the design, but the Public should always be wary. Furthermore, trust of anyone but God is not logical (on the premise that only God is infallible), and as for trusting science: trusting a scientist to tell you the whole truth is not science but faith.
By this foolish trust of society, since the COVID-19 crisis it has become clear that medical excuse, supported by the word of Government-appointed medical experts, has become the excuse of choice for Governments worldwide to suspend any human rights they deem fit for as long as they deem fit. On this excuse, Governments ordering places of worship to close and order people to take dangerous medical treatments at their own risk has already happened. As these treatments were often genetic, mass artificial genetic manipulation of humanity has happened. Many have died suddenly, many more have their lives shortened, the risk of infertility is an existential threat, and we will probably never be able to undo the changes in humanity's gene pool. Worse, due to majority acceptance of not only these 'vaccines' but mandates to go with them, more and more vaccines are in development and acceptance expected. Furthermore world governments are at work to join through the World Health Organization (WHO) to create a global pandemic treaty which would override all national concepts of human rights, and allow the WHO centralized control of the nations, if it decides to declare a pandemic. It is because of excessive Public trust in the profession of medicine that humanity may be completely enslaved, and more likely completely extinct, by the time this political-medical tyranny is finished, if it is not immediately stopped.
CLEARSIGHT: How to understand this issue correctly in 5 seconds starting with only a conventional understanding:
If this wasn't the case, then:
About CLEARFACTS: Respond.is 'Clearfacts' presentations are an attempt to pick out just those facts from an issue which are of the greatest importance to protect life with any evidence they reasonably require. They are not an attempt to address all important aspects of an issue, but are a intended as a tool for sharing truth: getting the most important and incontestable points across to other people while consuming the minimum of their attention. Although the presentation does include hyperlinks, it is presented in black print on white background for easy printing, with the following QR code for easy sharing (a link to this webpage):
Conventional Medicine page
Back to website Homepage